Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Global Warming by Latuff2 Global Warming by Latuff2
High resolution version for printing purposes: [link]
Add a Comment:
 
:iconriegel2222:
Riegel2222 Featured By Owner May 7, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
You have been brainwashed by the government to believe this shit? Uh you're such a control freak. You would probably let the government destroy the planet as long as it's not corporations. It's the socialist governments that fund big corporations and surpress small business. They also fund the GMO lobby. You probably would also love the government to spray stuff into the air to stop this "global warming" shit.
Reply
:iconfinnishecosocialist:
FinnishEcoSocialist Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2013  Hobbyist Interface Designer
This is why I'm eco-socialist
Reply
:iconmasonicon:
masonicon Featured By Owner Jan 14, 2012  Student General Artist
Do you know, most of Climate Change 'solutions' are just for Capitalism
Reply
:icontsukiyomi07:
tsukiyomi07 Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2011
ok some logical points from yalls conversations , glad to see <3. but some illogical points too, the soviet union had many of the exact same oppressive structures as we see today. what makes up "opposite"? what makes some conditions inevitable and others negotiable? But also if we are willing to recognize the production in the world as being recognizably similar enough to each other and thus you can classify it with one label like "capitalism" , how is it possible one can say that the way the world works is somehow external to this, the ruling order of the day? I think there were many many chances to be less destructive in the world than either the soviet union , china, and the "Capitalist countries" (if you want to break it down further thats fine by me) have been. i think an important point to start with talking of these production related systemic workings is to be polite to each other and not be divisive, because the only way to solve these things is together , not with the delusion that we are somehow unconnected individuals.

p.s. 95% of communists/socialists today aren't a bunch of soviet/china "communism" nostalgia freaks, if you want to see what i mean check out the socialist standard from the uk , [link] , i don't think of it as a system but a philosophy to draw from . if you were to ask me the correct direction to go economically worldwide it would be something like this [link] .
Reply
:iconeverythingfan3000:
everythingfan3000 Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2011
Okay, I've been looking at pieces from this gallery for a few days now, haven't been commenting, couldn't really think of anything to say. This...
Even if there was no capitalism, we would still have factories, we would still have cars, we would still have power plants, because even if there are no capitalists, people still have needs. Even without capitalism, there would still be a huge population, which can only be supplied by mass production. You can't feed a country the old way, you can't supply a country the old way, and you can't clothe a country the old way. We can never go back to before the industrial revolution, which was not caused by capitalism in the first place, so it is still not to blame for the current pollution issues. Overpopulation, which is not caused by capitalism, is partly/mostly to blame for pollution issues. What causes overpopulation is more people being born than dying, which is only because we have more advanced medicine, and poor quality education in most of the places of the world that have these issues.
Reply
:iconzanondorf:
Zanondorf Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2011
very good arguement, and what you're saying is quite true. example, the Soviet Union has done quite a lot of environmental destruction contributing to global warming and other severe environmental disasters, and they were obviously the opposite of capitalism.
Reply
:iconeverythingfan3000:
everythingfan3000 Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2011
I don't think it did any more or less environmental damage, though nuclear testing and power have resulted in radiation near or in populated areas, but proportionally, the USSR didn't do any more or less damage than any other country for it's size. Just saying. As far as I know.
But thank you for agreeing with me~
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
I feel the same way, capitalism invokes nothing but greed, exploitation and crises.
The Capitalist pig should fry.
Reply
:iconoddfox17:
OddFox17 Featured By Owner Aug 22, 2011  Student Writer
And socialism is somehow better?
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Aug 27, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Absolutely not! DX
Reply
:iconoddfox17:
OddFox17 Featured By Owner Aug 27, 2011  Student Writer
Then what do you suggest we do?
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Aug 27, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
I don't really know, I'm no miracle worker. But hey, I'm trying to think of something.
Reply
:iconoddfox17:
OddFox17 Featured By Owner Aug 27, 2011  Student Writer
Think faster.
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Aug 27, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Why don't you do the same? :evileye:
Reply
:iconrailrevo333:
railrevo333 Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Indeed and China is a paradise. There is no horrific environmental devastation, child deformation, political corruption, greed, and complete disregard for human rights there at all.

Capitalism is obviously the ultimate manifestation of evil.
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Whoa, you don't have to be sarcastic with me.

I know communism is extremely corrupt, too. Especially China’s version. The CCP runs their workers and resources into the ground, and allow foreign capitalists to exploit them as well. They’re so crooked; it’s a disgrace. :X
Reply
:iconrailrevo333:
railrevo333 Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Indeed it is. Every government works on paper, but none truly work in real life.

Communism ends in a totalitarianism. Capitalism ends in a grim corporate dystopia, etc. Sorry for any offense, but yea, capitalism is by no means the sole cause of global warming.
Reply
:iconcosmic--chaos:
Cosmic--Chaos Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
I know capitalism isn't solely responsible for global warning. It's irresponsibility and lack of respect for the environment, and how important the latter is.
Reply
:iconrailrevo333:
railrevo333 Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Indeed, but environmental disrespect comes with any government/people who take up the banner of industry. Steps are being taken by every government currently, despite the u.s. and Britian still having their heads stuck up their asses. It will round off eventually, because the fuels that cause pollution are drying up quickly.
Reply
:iconlolfinder99:
lolfinder99 Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2011
Since when capitalism means destruction?
Reply
:iconmatiasmatiasmatias45:
Well done!!

Salutes from Argentina!!
Reply
:iconnu818:
nu818 Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2009
hehe is that obama on the chair !!!
Reply
:iconahmedqatar:
Ahmedqatar Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2009
I agree !!
Reply
:iconschattenlotus:
SchattenLotus Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2009
Hmm No. The Hand is to light ;3

But well, Yes, Capitalism is a successful Instrument for slowly drive the Nature of our Planet into Ruin... ;)

"After us the Deluge/Floot"

Well, some People are such A**holes, they really give a Crap about ruining the Nature for Capital.

When the World's Nature in 100 Years is much less healthy - they are already dead.

Anti-Sociality 4 the Win <3 =_=
Reply
:iconnu818:
nu818 Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2009
lolz... who gives a cosmic shit bout our solar system.. :P
same guys making capital by polluting the earth.
now trying to make money by " waking up the earth " and polluting it in the same time.
eat my short Copenhagen .
i pee toxics and fart carbons
:D:D:D:D:D:D
Reply
:iconschattenlotus:
SchattenLotus Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2009
The Global Warming is unstoppable and natural.


Whats important, is, there is no need to rush it unnessesary with ruining the Nature ;)

Maybe Mankind will manage to 'transform' something natural into a Disaster a bit...
Reply
:iconnu818:
nu818 Featured By Owner Dec 17, 2009
yup.. and the worst part is everybody is just falling for the propaganda bout the carbon tax..
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
December 16, 2009
Image Size
69.0 KB
Resolution
800×805
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
9,054 (3 today)
Favourites
68 (who?)
Comments
28
Downloads
1,076

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×