| Traditional Art / Drawings / Political | ©2010-2012 ~Latuff2 |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |





given that the Islamists you fawn over would have you killed for doing the same to them.
Those evil Imperialists and their freedom of speech, eh?
--
C'thulhu fhtagn!
--
"Children, your performance was miserable. Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now."-
Ms. Bitters (Invader Zim)
"It's the hardest thing in the world to go on being aware of someone else's pain”- Pat Barker
--
By Jove I've got it!
I'm surprised he didn't go in for skin whitening yet!
Obama's Mother is white and Father from Kenya; He not descent from slaves.
--
By Jove I've got it!
Just my two cents.
If the aim is to 'hunt down extremists', then he is going about it the wrong way. Warfare is not an effective way to stop extremism nor bring criminals to justice. And, if by chance it were effective, it would still be unacceptable because of the cost to the civilians in the region. Think of it this way: Would you have agreed if the government had decided to bomb Oklahoma to get Tim McVeigh?
The US _does not_ have the right of self defense if that is used to mean aggressive war on a country that _did not_ attack it. An extremist terrorist group attacked, and thus the US has the right to take multilateral police action against that group. It doesn't have the right to smash up a country with violence and warfare (after supporting a group there so vicious that the Taliban was welcomed with open arms).
If we do agree that the US does have the right to be taking military action in self defense, then just about every country south of the American border has the right to launch drone attacks on Washington.
Lastly, I have no doubt that Obama is doing it, as you say, "for a political reason".